In today’s highly competitive world, you need all the tools to get ahead. Appearing to be spiritual will help you tremendously, and so I’m going to teach you how to be a fake philosopher today.
The official definition of philosophy is “Stuff that no one really understands”. It is similar to Jargoneese, but different at the same levels in that Jargoneese and Philosophy have similar differences. Jargoneese is using symbolism to re-interpret vagaries of daily life, while philosophy is using vagaries of daily life to re-interpret symbolism. Got it? Good. Continue reading…
The following are some tips that will help you sound like a philosopher:
Tip #1: Use simple words, but complex constructs.
It is a common misconception that Philosophers use big words. You’ll get the best effect if you use simple words, but construct sentences that are difficult to understand. The central idea is to awe the victim. Your victim should feel stupid that he can’t understand what you’re saying despite you using such simple language.
Boring Guy: “How’s life man?”
Wrong Answer: “It’s great! I crashed into a Bufallo last week, I think I’m going to flunk this year, and I forgot to have lunch today. Other that that, it’s awesome.”
Right Answer™ : “It’s like a bread crumb in a tomato soup. You can float without swimming, but eventually you’ll get eaten.”
Tip #2: Use oxymoronic opposites.
The best kind of philosophy is the kind that your brain simply can’t comprehend. There are plenty of ways to achieve this effect, but by far the easiest is to use 2 opposite words together, so that their combined meaning is incomprehensible, and at best, impossible. Good examples include:
“similar differences”
“burning ice”
“irrationality principle”
“satisfied life”
Try to use as many of these in your sentences. Eg:
“The irrationality principle advocated by Kant suffers from the ‘burning ice’ problem leading to similar differences from his earlier work on realizing a satisfied life”
Tip #3: Say “I’ll give you an example”. Then don’t give the example.
Examples are usually given to explain something because people learn quicker if they can relate it to something they already know. This is a very powerful weapon, if you use only half of it. Give an example of something that your victim is familiar with, but don’t explain how to relate it.
Clueless guy after watching the Matrix: “Huh? What does the movie mean?”
Wrong Answer: “See…Neo is the One, (“neo” is just “one” spelt differently) and he’s fighting the machines that are running a virtual world…”
Right Answer™ : “It’s quite simple actually. Let me give you an example: Neo dogging bullets is like having self-realized chicken around a lemon tree in a farm – The Farmer wants the lemons, but the supply of eggs is near-limitless. Get it?”
Tip #4: Use Random Metaphors
This is an advanced version of Tip #3. Philosophy is mostly using bad metaphors to explain something you don’t understand in the first place. Learn this well, it will come in handy.
Boring guy: “Should I buy my car in the “Red River” color or the “Green Golbin” color?”
Wrong Answer: “It doesn’t matter, moron, because it’ll look brown with all the dirt it’ll accumulate.”
Right Answer™ : “It’s like stopping at a traffic signal – Life stops at the red signal, but many people jump it, just the same as the green color. In the end, what matters is what kind of person you are. Think about that, and you’ll have your answer.”
You are now ready to try these out on unsuspecting victims. Let me know how it goes.
3 Responses
Sandeep
October 4th, 2007 at 8:50 am
1Hahaha! That was funny mate!
“Your victim should feel stupid that he can’t understand what you’re saying despite you using such simple language.”
Captures the essence in that one line!!
GNR
October 10th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
2Hey! Arvind, Did I get the name right, but as Shakeaspeare (and what about this?) said,” What’s there in the name” or something on this line. Anyways, this is not the point, the point lies in the huge dimension of scopeless mind that, at the end of culmination of a feeling, it may be anger, happiness, sorrow, expresses it in the most convoluted form that we call physical gestures. These bodily (if there’s any word that is spelt bodily) movement translates the chemical and biological reactions of our conscious into visual effects.
After reading this philosphical piece of yours, my brain felt an urge to relentlessly give out to the harsh laugh that was bubbling to burst out like a volcano. And it did, to the utter surprise of the lower forms of life, who decline to get out of the vagaries of this world and rise higher, who had been sitting near my work station at the office.
Though all that I have said uptill now would have lost meaning for one and all, whoever dares to read this (even me), what i wanted o say was your piece was really fantastic. keep supplying!!
Aditya Kulkarni
October 11th, 2007 at 9:50 pm
3Thank you all! You’re all welcome. Use your super-powers wisely.
Being a philosopher is a gift. And a curse.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Recent Posts
Feeds
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
Subscribe via Email
Aditya Updates
Most Discussed Posts